Building Objective Psychometric Instruments
Data Diagnosis, Outliers and Examining Parametric Test
Assumptions
Data Transformations, Difference Scores,
Proportion-of-Control Scores & Control-Residualized Scores
Distribution-Free Tests (Monte Carlo, Permutation,
Etc.)
Individual Differences: Concepts
Mediation and Moderation Analyses
(Topics: Bayesian stats, Cluster analysis, COV, Prep, Orthogonal polynomial coeffs, Controlling familywise error, Flavors of correlations, Dichotomizing, Ethics, Fitting
distributions, Missing data, Ordinal regression, MS Excel tricks, Philosophy of science, Probing GLM and HLM Interactions, Random sampling of stimuli, Repeated-
Measures GLM as a Between-Subjects ANOVA/Regression, Trimmed estimators of central tendency, What statistical reviewers like/dislike)
Psychometrics for Affective Neuroscientists
Single Subject ("Case Study") Analyses
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Teaching (and Learning) Univariate Parametric
Statistics
Testing for Significant Differences Between Cronbach's
Alphas
Testing Pairwise Differences in Within-Subjects
(Repeated-Measures) Designs
The Visual Display of Quantitative
Information
Unequal Cell Frequencies ("n's") (a.k.a. "Unbalanced
Designs")
Why I Don't Use MS Excel for Statistics
Within-Subjects (Repeated-Measures) Error Bars
Still Can't Find It? Jump to Unsorted Files
(e.g., ANCOVA, assumption testing, data transformation, differential deficits, Lord's Paradox, matching, mediation/moderation, meta-analysis, NP stats, psychometrics, rank transform, regression to the mean, etc.)
Jump to Professional Development Resources
Return to Shackman's Homepage or Laboratory for Affective Neuroscience or Waisman Laboratory for Brain Imaging and Behavior
Picking Which Statistical Test to
Use
Note: ...recognize that the selection of a statistical
procedure may to some extent be a matter of judgment and that other
statisticians may select
alternative procedures. -- ASA Ethical Guidelines for Statistical Practice,
published by the American Statistical Association, 1989.
see also Hand, 1994
SISA Bonferroni Correction (see also the section on Controlling Familywise Error)
Betty Jung's collection
Mediation and Moderation Analyses
Kris Preacher, University of Kansas
Paul Jose's Mediation & Moderation Help Centre
Published Papers
Baron & Kenny (1986) {the seminal explication}
Coan & Allen (2004) {discusses applications of moderator/mediator analyses to neurophysiological data}
Frazier, Tix, & Barron (2004) {good, non-technical introduction}
Holmbeck (1997) {good, non-technical introduction}
Holmbeck (2002) {good, non-technical introduction}
Irwin & McClelland (2001) {moderation analyses}
Judd, Kenny & McClelland (2001) {repeated-measures|within-subjects mediation and moderation analyses; see also Judd et al., 1996}
MacKinnon, Lockwood, Hoffman, West & Sheets (2002) {quantitative comparison of techniques for testing mediation}
MacKinnon, Lockwood & Williams (2004) {fleshes out some of the issues raised in MacKinnon et al., 2002}
Muller, Judd & Yzerbyt (in press) {mediated moderation and moderated mediation}
Shrout & Bolger (2002) {discuss bootstrapping techniques for testing mediation; cf. MacKinnon et al., 2002, 2004}
Spencer, Zanna & Fong (in press) {criticism of the overapplication of mediation analyses}
Karl Wuensch's Summary
Download mediationmodels.doc
On-line Sobel Test Calculator
(see also Preacher & Hayes, 2004 and the accompanying syntax (Preacher-BRMIC-2004.zip) and data (Figure2data.sav)
(an updated bootstrapping approach: syntax; website & local mirror)
Paul Jose's Excel-Based Moderation and Mediation Plot Generators and Sobel Calculator
Download local mirror of ModGraph.xls
Download local mirror of MedGraph.xls
Jeremy Dawson's Excel-Based Moderation (2-way and 3-way interaction) Plot Generators
Download instructions
Download local mirror of 2-waybinary.xls
Download local mirror of 2-waystandardised.xls
Download local mirror of 2-wayunstandardised.xls
Download local mirror of 3-waystandardised.xls
Download local mirror of 3-wayunstandardised.xls
Jason Newsom's SPSS Macros
Download instructions
Download local mirror of simple1.sps
Download local mirror of simple2.sps
Dirk Enzmann's Tools
Local mirror for archival purposes
Keywords: CI and p's for 2 independent betas; centering variables for interactions in GLM; macro for writing out COV matrix; macro for creating
dummy variables; Excel-template for plotting interactions of a regression equation with interaction term; executable for computing the
reliability of a difference score, macro for computing a biserial correlation; executable for calculating the p, 95%-CI, and Fisher's Z for r;
macro for computing tetrachoric correlations; program for computing tetrachoric correlations
Excel-Based Calculator for the Clogg and
Freedman-Schatzkin Tests
Download Calculator
Conceptual Resources for Individual Differences Analyses
...and an application, via ANCOVA, to improving sensitivity
Psychometrics for Affective Neuroscientists
General Resources
Nunnally & Bernstein's Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed.
Tomarken, A. J., Davidson, R. J., Wheeler, R. E., & Kinney, L. (1992). Psychometric properties of resting anterior EEG asymmetry: Temporal stability and internal consistency. Psychophysiology, 29, 576-592. {application to resting EEG data}
Web-based Expertise
G. David Garson's Reliability Page
John Uebersax's ICC Page
Robert Yaffee's ICC Page
Internet-based Calculator
Construct Validity
Some lecture notes
Correcting Measures of Association for Attenuation Caused by Imperfect Reliability
Charles, 2005, Psychological Methods
deShon, 1998, Psychological Methods {application to SEM}
Schmidt & Hunter, 1999, Intelligence (and Borsoom & Mellenbergh's 2002 Comment)
G Theory
Di Nocera et al., 2001, Psychophysiology
Internal Consistency
Schmidt, F.L., Le, H. & Llies, R. (2003) {discuss metrics "beyond" Cronbach's alpha for more fully characterizing different sources of variance}
Chong Ho Yu's Notes
Intra-class Correlations
Muller & Buttner (1994) (cf. Vargha's comment) {contains a decision-making tree for picking the appropriate ICC}
McGraw & Wong, 1996, Psychological Methods [erratum] {drawing inferences about ICCs}
Shrout & Fleiss, 1979, Psychological Bulletin {the seminal introduction}
Item Response Theory
Reise et al., 2005 {general introduction}
Measurement Error
Schmidt & Hunter, 1996 {a wonderful general introduction for non-experts}
Reliability
Deanna Barch's notes
Shrout, 1998, SiM {general introduction}
Michael Smithson's notes
Thompson & Vacha-Haase, 2000, EPM
Reliability of Difference (Change, Growth, Gain) Scores
Dirk Enzmann's code for computing the reliability of a difference score (cf. Zimmerman & Williams, 1982): reldiff.exe
Test-Retest Stability
NB: Simple Pearson correlations are appropriate when the main question is the stability of individual differences irrespective of mean differences across assessments, as when habituation effects are likely
Allen, J.J.B., Urry, H.L., Hitt, S.K., & Coan, J.A. (2004) {application to resting EEG data}
Within-Subjects (Repeated Measures) Error Bars & Confidence Intervals
Cummings, G. & Finch, S. (2005) {Drawing correct inferences from error bars}
Masson, M.E.J. & Loftus, G.R. (2003). Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology {The definitive source}
Christian Schunn's perspective {Drawing correct inferences
from error bars}
Data Diagnosis / Examining Parametric GLM Assumptions
General
A Short Summary of Tips
Kruskall on "Wild Observations" {underscores both the importance of keeping careful notes at the time the data was collected and the potential utility of non-parametric methods}...see also Anscombe and Guttman, 1960 (and Kruskal et al's commentary) and Beckman and Cook, 1983
Remember, Influence = Leverage x Discrepancy
Leverage = distance of a case from the centroid of the swarm; related to Mahalanobis D: D = (N-1)(L - 1/N)) or L = (D/(N-1)) + (1/N)
Discrepancy = degree to which a case lies off the GLM or HLM fit-line
Cook's D > 1
absolute values of DFBETA > 2/(sqrt(N))
Mahalanobis D with p < .001, evaluated on the Chi-Square Distribution with df equal to the number of variables
Absolute value of the standardized residual >3.3 (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2001)
Visually inspect the scatter plot formed by the residuals and the leverage for outliers.
Examining the Assumptions of Normality, Linearity, Zero-Mean-Centered, and Homoscedasticity of Residuals
Create a scatter plot of the residuals (y-axis) against the predicted values of the DV (x-axis) (see also this page)
Examine residuals for each assumption, as well as possible outliers (see above)
Homoscedasticity Rule of Thumb: the spread of SDs of residuals around predicted values is 3x greater for the widest vs. the narrowest spread (Fox, 1991 [also provides some formal tests, pp. 64-66]) �
NB: There is no distributional assumptions about the IVs, other than their relationship with the DV. However, a prediction equation often is enhanced if IVs are normally distributed, primarily because linearity between the IV and DV is enhanced (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2001, p. 119). It is, however, assumed that continuous IVs are not afflicted with outliers.
Note: Combined with knowledge of sample size, these resources can help determine whether the use of nonparametric tests (see below) is warranted (cf. Riniolo & Porges, 2000)
Books
The Cohen's textbook and the revision
Fox's Regression Diagnostics
Steven's textbook [good description of transformations, residual plots, rules of thumb for leverage/Cook's D, rules of thumb for detection of non-normality, rules of thumb for variance-cell frequency interactions, rules of thumb for diagnosing and dealing with multicolinearity]
Tabachnick & Fidell's textbook (see esp. Chs. 4, 5 and 9.3) [describes different diagnostics and treatments of outliers/leverage/influence; describes how you might describe this for publication]
Weisberg's textbook (Chapters 1, 7-9)
Presentations
Download a MS Powerpoint presentation describing different kinds of residuals, leverage, etc.
Web-based Resources
Alex Yu's page
Published Reports
Bryk & Raudenbush, Psychological Bulletin, 1985 {heterogeneity of variances}
Chatfield, JRSSA, 1985 {exploratory data analysis; cf. Tukey's books}
Conover et al., Technometrics, 1981 {comparison of homogeneity of variance tests}
Grubbs, Technometrics, 1969 {outliers test}
Lix et al., RER, 1996 {quantitative review of alternatives to conventional F test}
Mallows, TAS, 1979 {exploratory data analysis}
Zhang, Luo & Nichols, HBM, 2006 {application of EDA/NP to neuroimaging data}
Levene's Test for Dependent Student's t Test
See here
Multivariate and Bivariate Normality (see also Assessing the Presence of Groups in Bivariate Relations)
Papers
Books
Gnanadesikan's book
SPSS Macros
Lawrence DeCarlo's macro for univariate and multivariate skew and kurtosis
Lawrence DeCarlo's macro for Mardia's multivariate skew and kurtosis
Data Transformations, Difference Scores, Proportion of Control Scores & Control-Residualized Scores
Data Transformations
Discussed extensively in Cohen et al. (suggest the possibility of using ARC to estimate an optimal λ)
See Steven's Graphical Rules of Thumb
Logrithmic transformations {underscores that natural logs are useful because the SD of the logged data is approximately equal to the coefficient of variation (SD/mean) of the raw data ... for constructing CIs on logged data, see Zhou & Gao's report; for computing meta-analytic estimates of the SD of a logged measure, see Quan and Zhang's report}
Z-Scores, Difference Scores, and Proportion of Control Scores
Control-Residualized Scores
Gross, Sutton & Ketelaar, 1998
Controlling for "Initial" Values (i.e., Uncorrelating Treatment-Post from Control-Pre Values)
Misc. Transforms and Comparisons of Transforms with an Emphasis on RT Distributions (and Dealing with Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs)
Gasser et al., 1982 {transformations applied to EEG data}
Ratcliff, 1993 {cf. speed-accuracy tradeoffs}
Salthouse & Hedden, 2002 {describes several more sophisticated means of dealing with speed-accuracy tradeoffs}
Ulrich & Miller, 1994 {cf. speed-accuracy tradeoffs}
Rank Transformations
Rank transformations (RTs) represent a
potentially powerful, extremely practical means of satisfying the prerequisites
for GLM analyses. However, a number of issues and concerns have cropped up since
the landmark publication of Conover and Iman's 1981 review paper advocating the
utility of RTs. Rank-transformations should not be blindly applied. In
particular, concerns have arisen in the context of repeated-measures designs
(e.g., rank-transformation can reduce/alter the correlation between
repeated-measures, leading to a loss of power) and factorial designs (i.e, as a
non-linear transformation, RT can fundamentally alter tests of factorial
interactions). Consequently, several important modified RT approaches (e.g.,
aligned-rank-transform) have more recently been proposed. Regardless of the
transform chosen, descriptive statistics for the raw and transformed data should
be carefully compared to one another and to the assumptions of the applicable
inferential test(s). Transformation does not guarantee improvement
(e.g., RT will not invariably suppress outliers).
Reviews
Conover and Iman's 1981 review {rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric tests}
Sawilowsky, RER, 1990 {review of NP techniques, including rank-transforms, for testing interactions}
Reports
Akritas, JASA, 1990 {asymptotic rank-transform applied to two-way ANOVA}
Akritas, JASA, 1991 {critical investigation of the rank-transform applied to repeated-measures}
Akritas et al., JASA, 1997 {rank-transform applied to unbalanced factorial ANOVA}
Beasley, JEBS, 2000 {NP tests for interactions in mixed-model/split-plot factorial designs}
Beasley & Zumbo, CSDA, 2003 {application of modified ranks to mixed-model/split-plot designs}
Brunner & Dette, JASA, 1992 {modified rank-transform for mixed-model/split-plot factorial designs}
Conover & Iman, Biometrics, 1982 {rank-transform applied to ANCOVA}
Gao & Song, BMCI, 2005 {nice overview of rank-transforms and aligned-rank transforms for factorial designs}
Harwell & Serlin, Psychological Bulletin, 1988 {power of various NP (including rank-transform, "MPF model") approaches to ANCOVA}
Headrick & Rotou, CSDA, 2001 {application of rank-transform to multiple regression}
Hora & Conover, JASA, 1984 {rank-transform applied to two-way ANOVA}
Iman & Conover, Technometrics, 1979 {rank-transform applied to regression} and corrigendum
Kepner & Wackerly, JASA, 1996 {rank-transform applied to repeated-measures ANOVA}
Lei, Holt & Beasley, JMASM, 2004 {aligned-rank transform applied to interaction tests in mixed-model designs tested using modified ANOVA/MANOVA}
Payton et al, JEE, 2006 {comparison of aligned-ranks, rank-transform, and power-family transforms for testing interactions}
Sawilowsky, Blair & Higgins, JES, 1989 {critical study of the power of the rank-transformed ANOVA}
Thompson & Ammann, JASA, 1990 {rank-transform and aligned-ranks applied to repeated-measures}
Thompson, JASA, 1991 {ranks applied to repeated-measures designs}
Toothaker & De Newman, JEBS, 1994 {power of various NP (including rank-transform and aligned-ranks) approaches to ANOVA}
Application
Higgins' text (2004) on aligned rank-transforms
Web-Based Resources
Miscellaneous
Q: I have ordinal variables and thus used Spearman's rho. How do I use these ordinal correlations in SPSS for
partial correlation, regression, and other procedures?
A: You got the output by selecting Statistics, Correlate, then checking Spearman's rho as the correlation type. This
invoked the NONPAR CORR procedure, but the dialog boxes (as of ver. 7.5) did not provide for matrix output. Re-run
the Spearman's correlations from the syntax window, which is invoked with File, New, Syntax. Enter syntax such as the
following,
then run it:
NONPAR CORR VARIABLES= horse engine cylinder
/MATRIX=OUT(*).
The correlation matrix will now be in the SPSS Data Editor, where you change the
ROWTYPE_ variable values to CORR
instead of RHO. Optionally, you may want to select File, Save As at this point to save your matrix. Then select Statistics,
Correlate, Partial Correlation (or another procedure) and SPSS will use the Spearman's matrix as input. Alternatively, in
the syntax window use MATRIX=IN(*) in PARTIAL CORR or another procedure which accepts a correlation matrix as
input. (http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/correl.htm#ordinal2)
Reliability and Criterion Validity of Difference Scores
Software
Cook and Weisberg's Arc software and book {permits computation of Box-Cox lambda and Yeo-Johnson transforms} {for more info on a quick graphical method for estimating B-C lambda, see this report; these should only be used when values less than or equal to 0 are encountered}
Building Objective Psychometric Instruments
Clark, L.A. & Watson, D. (1995) {Extremely thorough, readable introduction}
Floyd, F.J. & Widaman, K.F. (1995)
Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, G.T. & McCarthy, D.M. (1995)
Smith, G.T., Fischer, S. & Fister, S.M.
(2003) {Describe modified key criterion
approach}
Web-Based Expertise
Raynald's Page and Links and Book
Dirk Enzmann's page of tools (local mirror for archival purposes)
Keywords: CI and p's for 2 independent betas; centering variables for interactions in GLM; macro for writing out COV matrix; macro for creating
dummy variables; Excel-template for plotting interactions of a regression equation with interaction term; executable for computing the
reliability of a difference score, macro for computing a biserial correlation; executable for calculating the p, 95%-CI, and Fisher's Z for r;
macro for computing tetrachoric correlations; program for computing tetrachoric correlations
Lists
Books
xxx
Macros
Scripts (see also Raynald's Page)
Create as many .sav files as there are .txt files in a directory and then (optionally) merge them: CreateAll.sbs
{an alternate technique is to use the
DOS command: copy *.txt merged.txt}{or the UNIX command: cat FILES >
OUTPUT where FILES is a list with(out) wildcards and OUTPUT is the target file
name}
Example of line continuation:
strCmd = "GET DATA /TYPE =
TXT /FILE = '" & strPath & strFname & "' /DELCASE = LINE /DELIMITERS
= '\t' /ARRANGEMENT = DELIMITED " _
& "/FIRSTCASE = 1
/IMPORTCASE = All /VARIABLES = rsf1 A25 rsf2 A25 rsf3 A25 rsf4 A25 rsf5 A25 rsf6
A25 rsf7 A25 rsf8 A25 rsf9 A25 rsf10 A25 rsf11 A25 rsf12 "
_
& "A25 rsf13 A25 rsf14
A25 rsf15 A25 rsf16 A25 rsf17 A25 rsf18 A25 rsf19 A25 rsf20 A25 rsf21 A25 rsf22
A25 rsf23 A25 rsf24 A25 rsf25 A25 rsf26 A25 rsf27 A25 rsf28 "
_
& "A25 rsf29 A25 rsf30
A25 rsf31 A25 rsf32 A25 rsf33 A25 rsf34 A25 rsf35 A25 rsf36 A25 rsf37 A25 rsf38
A25 rsf39 A25 rsf40 A25 rsf41 A25 rsf42 A25 rsf43 A25 rsf44 "
_
& "A25 rsf45 A25 rsf46
A25 rsf47 A25 rsf48 A25 rsf49 A25 rsf50 A25 rsf51 A25 rsf52 A25 rsf53 A25 rsf54
A25 rsf55 A25 rsf56 A25 rsf57 A25 rsf58 A25 rsf59 A25 rsf60 "
_
& "A25 rsf61 A25 rsf62
A25 rsf63 A25 rsf64 A25 rsf65 A25 rsf66 A25 rsf67 A25 rsf68 A25 rsf69 A25 rsf70
A25 rsf71 A25 rsf72 A25 rsf73 A25 rsf74 A25 rsf75 A25 rsf76 "
_
& "A25 rsf77 A25 rsf78
A25 rsf79 A25 rsf80 A25 rsf81 A25 rsf82 A25 rsf83 A25 rsf84 A25 rsf85 A25 rsf86
A25 rsf87 A25 rsf88 A25 rsf89 A25 rsf90 A25 rsf91 A25 rsf92 "
_
& "A25 rsf93 A25 rsf94
A25 rsf95 A25 rsf96 A25 rsf97 A25 rsf98 A25 rsf99 A25 rsf100 A25 rsf101 A25
rsf102 A25 rsf103 A25 rsf104 A25 rsf105 A25 rsf106 A25 rsf107 "
_
& "A25 rsf108 A25 rsf109
A25 rsf110 A25 rsf111 A25 rsf112 A25 rsf113 A25 rsf114 A25 rsf115 A25 rsf116 A25
rsf117 A25 rsf118 A25 rsf119 A25 rsf120 A25 rsf121 A25 "
_
& "rsf122 A25 rsf123 A25
rsf124 A25 rsf125 A25 rsf126 A25 rsf127 A25 rsf128 A25 rsf129 A25 ."� &
vbCr
strCmd = strCmd & "SAVE
OUTFILE='" & strPath & Mid(strFname,1,InStr(strFname,".")-1) &
".sav'." & vbCr
strCmd = strCmd & "Execute."
Using MATLAB to Painlessly Create Dummy
Variables
Go there
Summary of Correspondence Concerning "Large" Files in SPSS
Download it
Written by Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka of the University of Kassel. Takes as input a list of syntax files or a file containing a list of syntax files. The program runs each syntax one by one and create a separate output file for each of the syntax files. Note that you must include a Get File command in each .sps file, e.g.,
GET
FILE='C:\Documents and Settings\SHACKMAN\Desktop\test.sav'.
Hints for Testing Pairwise (Planned or Post Hoc) Differences in Within-Subjects/Mixed Models
<<under construction>>
Download a description of modifying SPSS Syntax
Read David Howell's textbook or visit his web site
Tips from SPSS Inc.
Download readme.txt
Download Syntax: rmpostl.sps, rmpostb.sps, and rmpostd.sps
Testing for Significant Differences Between Correlations
Web-Based Expertise
James Steiger, Vanderbilt
Independent Correlations
Vassar Stats Calculator
A Correlation and the Hypothesized Value of that Correlation (r vs. rho Hypothesis Test)
Vassar Stats Calculator
Dependent Correlations
Download SPSS Syntax
Download Excel-Based Calculator
See also, Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) (and Andrew Hayes SPSS syntax)
Two Pairs of Dependent Correlations
Raghunathan, T. E., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1996)
Nonparametric Correlations
You could first convert tau or rho coefficients to approximations of r (as described in this report) before proceeding as usual.
Or
You could perform the usual computations on ranks, as described in this report.
Distribution-Free Tests (Monte Carlo, Permutation, Etc.)
<<under construction>>
but see Tom Nichols' website, the LORETA website, the NPStat website, and David Howell's Resampling website
The Consequences of Unequal Cell Frequencies (a.k.a. "Unbalanced Designs")
see a mirror of David Howell's page
Testing for Significant DifferencesBetween 2 Cronbach's Alphas
Published Reports
Feldt, L. S. (1980).
Feldt, L. S., & Ankenmann, R. D. (1998).
Feldt, L. S., & Ankenmann, R. D. (1999).
Feldt LS, Woodruff DJ, Salih FA. (1987).
Hakstian, A.R. & Barchard, K.A. (2000).
Syntax
Andrew Hayes' SPSS syntax
Excel-Based Calculator for Testing the Difference Between Dependent Cronbach's Alphas
Click here
Introductory Material for Non-parametric Statistics (see also Distribution-Free Tests)
Picking a nonparametric test (see also the section on Rank-Transforms)
Picking an appropriate non-parametric test
Web-based References
Angela Hebel's Powerpoint presentation
Books
Siegel and Castellan's text
Higgins text
Published Reports
A report by Nijsse on appropriately testing Kendall's tau and Spearman's rho.
A report showing how to convert from tau and
rho to approximate values of Pearson's r.
Blair & Higgins, Psychological Bulletin, 1985 {power of the paired-samples Student's t vs. NP alternatives}
Higgins, 2004 {comparison of the power and efficiency of common parametric and NP mean-difference tests}
Sawilowsky, RER, 1990 {review of NP techniques, including rank-transforms, for testing interactions}
Why I Don't Use MS Excel for Stats
The Visual Display of Quantitative Information
Edward Tufte's web site (see also, Clay Helberg's Essay)
Anscombe, 1973, The American Statistician
Cleveland et al., 1982, Science {zooming out from a scatterplot causes observers to judge the correlation as larger}
Cleveland, 1984, The American Statistician
Cleveland, 1984b, The American Statistician
Fienberg, 1979, The American Statistician
Leong & Carlile, 1998, JNM {displaying spherical information}
PeltierTech's Excel Tricks: How to Make a Broken Y-Axis in MS Excel
<<see Psychometrics for Affective Neuroscientists>>
Single Subject ("Case Study") Analyses
Web Resources
Software
Published Papers
Abelson, 1985 {demonstrates that small effects, R^2, can make a big cumulative difference}
Dunlap et al. 2004 {Application to Multiple Regression}
Levine & Hullett, 2002 {eta-squared vs. partial-eta-squared}
Pierce, Block & Aguinis, 2004 {eta-squared vs. partial-eta-squared}
Cohen et al., 1999 {"POMP"}
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)
Web-based Expertise
Ed Rigdon's collection of links and FAQs
Graham et al., 2003, Structural Equation Modeling
Teaching (and Learning) Univariate Parametric Statistics
Web-based Expertise (see this page also)
Betty Jung's links
British Medical Journal Statistics Notes
Gerard E. Dallal's Little Handbook of Statistical Practice
G. David Garson's StatsNotes
Clay Helberg's Essay
Paul Johnson's Software
Don Macnaughton's collection of links and papers
B. Weaver's collection of links
An Introduction to ROC Analyses
About.Com's Tips I and II and III and IV
UC-Davis PostDoc Tips
David Saville's flowchart showing relations between MSE, SD, SED, and LSD
Frank Schmidt on NHST
Kris Preacher's Practical Stats Notes
Radiology Primers
Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC)
Sample Size Calculations I and II
Textbooks
Art Glenberg's XXXX
David Howell's XXXX, 5th
ed.
Gary McClelland's Seeing
Statistics
Statistics Packages
Bayesian Statistics
Cluster Analysis
Coefficient of Variation Inferences
Computing the Average Probability of Replication (now required for submission to Psychological Science)
Papers
Killeen, 2005, Psychological Science
Cumming, 2005, Psychological Science
Doros & Geier, 2005, Psychological Science
MacDonald, 2005, Psychological Science
Excel Calculators
Killeen's calculator
Cumming's calculator
see also Cohen, 1994
Contrast Coefficients of Orthogonal Polynomials: 3 to 75 groups
Fisher & Yates, 1963, Table XXIII (available at the Digital Fisher Archive)
Note on the organization of Table XXIII
Coefficients are arranged vertically from left (linear) to right (quadratic, etc.)
For n = 9 and above, only the right-hand half of the code is provided (including the mid-point for odd numbers of groups).
Contrast Codes and Dummy Codes Scripts
An alternative is to run a GLM with the variable (e.g., ID) you wish to code as k-1 codes...and have SPSS print the contrast codes to the output file...then use those in, e.g., regression analyses
Garcia, 2004 {critique of Bonferroni}
Miller et al., 2001 {FDR}
Note: p(FW Error) = 1 - (1-alpha)^c where alpha = PW alpha, and c = number of orthogonal tests
Note: The number of positive tests expected by chance is less than or equal to c * alpha